Overview of SFDR Product Classifications 2024 Revisions
In July 2024, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued its opinion (ESMA36-1079078717-2587) in response to the joint opinion from the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) (JC 2024 06). This joint opinion, shaped by extensive public consultations in September 2023, provides critical insights into proposed updates for the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).
In this article, we delve into the ESAs’ recommendations to the European Commission (EC), which aim to refine SFDR’s product classification system and enhance transparency standards, ultimately benefiting both institutional and retail investors.
Understanding the SFDR Level 1 Revision
The SFDR aims to create standardized disclosures for sustainable investments, ensuring that investors receive clear, comparable information on the sustainability features of financial products. In its 2024 opinion, the ESAs suggest that the current product classification system should evolve by adopting a taxonomy-driven approach to define sustainable investments and introducing a categorization model that assesses products based on regular reviews of category eligibility criteria.
Key Findings of the ESA Opinion
The ESAs found that the current SFDR framework results in disclosures that are often complex, making it difficult for investors, especially retail investors, to fully understand the sustainability of the financial products they purchase. Disclosures are currently leveraged by financial market participants to classify products as “Article 8” or “Article 9,” which, while useful as a marketing tool, risks encouraging greenwashing and misleading product labeling.
A New Product Categorization Model and/or a Sustainability Indicator
One of the most significant aspects of the ESAs’ recommendation is the introduction of a structured product categorization model. This model includes two main product categories, each with a unique focus and a sustainability threshold to ensure transparency and consistency across classifications.
Additionally, the ESAs suggest implementing a new indicator. Similar to the “Nutri-Score” for food products, this indicator could use a color-coded scale to help investors quickly gauge a product’s environmental or social sustainability.
Sustainable Product Category
Unified or Split Categories: The ESAs suggest defining one consolidated category for environmental and social products (E and S) or, alternatively, separating them into distinct classifications.
Sustainability Threshold: Investments must adhere to a minimum percentage of taxonomy-aligned activities, which must gradually increase. Products not aligned with taxonomy criteria must respect the “Do No Significant Harm” (DNSH) principle.
Government Bonds and DNSH: Government bonds within this category could be assessed based on general, standardized DNSH-aligned criteria.
Transition Product Category
Mix of EU Taxonomy KPIs: This category focuses on transition-related investments that align with EU goals, including reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
Exclusions and Sub-Categories: Exclusions apply to assets that conflict with sustainability objectives, while sub-categories such as “investor impact” focus on investments providing measurable social or environmental impact alongside financial returns.
Both categories require that products meeting the taxonomy-aligned criteria be regularly reviewed to ensure continued eligibility.
Revising the Definition of "Sustainable Investment"
A notable suggestion from the ESAs is to redefine “sustainable investment” within the SFDR to rely on taxonomy standards. In the absence of a social taxonomy, the ESAs recommend the EC prioritize environmental disclosures under the EU Taxonomy, while adopting alternative sustainability metrics, such as PAI indicators, for other economic and social activities.
Technical Recommendations and Improvements for Retail Investors
The ESAs also suggest technical changes to the SFDR framework. They recommend:
Standardized Government Bond Framework: Creating criteria specific to government bonds, accounting for the unique characteristics of this asset class.
Distribution Channel Adaptation: Tailoring disclosures to digital and other distribution channels to provide consistency across all platforms for greater investor convenience, particularly for retail investors.
Enhanced Disclosures and Transparency Requirements
The ESAs advocate for further refinement in SFDR disclosures to improve the transparency and reliability of information presented to investors. Notable improvements include:
More EU Taxonomy Alignment for Environmental Sustainability Disclosures: For other economic activities (i.e., non-eligible economic activities and social sustainability), the ESAs suggest the Commission should use appropriate sustainability metrics, such as PAI indicators.
Clear Labeling and Marketing Standards: Products lacking sustainability features must display disclaimers and minimal disclosures on any negative sustainability impact.
Expansion of PAI Transparency: Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) metrics should now be transparently presented at the individual product level and applied to all financial products to ensure comprehensive reporting.
Final Thoughts on the SFDR Product Classifications 2024
The 2024 revision to the SFDR product classification system marks a pivotal step toward reducing greenwashing and enhancing transparency in sustainable finance. By implementing a clear categorization model, revising definitions, and enhancing PAI disclosures, the ESAs aim to create a more reliable and investor-friendly framework. As these recommendations move forward, financial institutions and investors alike will need to stay informed to align with these evolving regulatory expectations.
For more insights on sustainable finance regulations and implementation updates, follow our blog for the latest developments.
