Featured in TABB Forum:
The emerging era of Bond Market instability is highlighted once again by the recent surge in 10-year and 30-year UK gilt yields, writes Joseph Cordahi, EMEA Sales Executive at NeoXam. How are Financial Institutions navigating these volatility challenges? In this article, Mr. Cordahi explains that Firms need to be more proactive in their Risk Management and use sophisticated Stress-Testing frameworks to withstand market turbulence.
The recent rise in 10-year and 30-year UK gilt yields might look familiar to those who remember the chaos of the mini-budget in 2022, but the underlying story is very different. At the time, markets recoiled at a government that brushed aside oversight from the likes of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), triggering a crisis of confidence. Last week’s surge in gilt yields fits into a larger but in many ways more unsettling pattern.
From the COVID-19-induced “Dash for cash” in March 2020, to the Eurozone debt crisis a decade ago, and even Japan’s yield curve control saga, the fragility of international Bond Markets under extreme stress has been highlighted repeatedly. With sovereign bond volatility hitting close to record levels worldwide this month, it would take a brave gambler to say we have seen the last of these disruptions.
Bond Markets are no longer the safe, predictable cornerstones of investment stability they were once thought to be. Away from the UK, the sell-off in U.S. 10-year bonds is driving yields higher across the world. Managing this new era of volatility demands a proactive approach — and that starts with more sophisticated stress testing. No longer just a Regulatory checkbox, stress testing is now a survival tool.
Yet many Financial Institutions remain woefully underprepared to run the detailed “what-if” scenarios needed to weather sharp market shocks. Consider the ramifications of a sudden 200-basis-point rise in gilt yields. Collateral calls on liability-driven investment strategies could force Asset liquidations in response to serious liquidity challenges.
Let’s face it, there is no telling how markets will react to possible government changes to fiscal policy in the coming weeks, making this type of scenario hardly beyond the realms of possibility. Without rigorous stress testing based on both historical and predictive Data, Fund Managers risk finding themselves flat-footed.
But effective stress testing isn’t as simple as plugging numbers into a spreadsheet. It requires a strong underlying infrastructure capable of handling complex calculations across Portfolios. Fund Managers need to account for correlations, leverage, and collateral requirements — all while factoring in the unique characteristics of each security, such as maturity dates and coupon levels.
Data Quality is the Achilles’ heel of these Stress-Testing efforts. Poor historical records or incomplete Portfolio Data can render even the most sophisticated models useless. To overcome this, Fund Managers need to be able to consolidate all Investment Data into a single, accurate view. Capturing positions, valuations, and exposures in real-time is the only way to lay solid foundations for meaningful Stress Tests.
Bond Markets have entered a new era. The events of the past decade — from the Eurozone crisis to pandemic-era liquidity strains — should serve as stark reminders of why we need more deliberate, proactive Risk Management measures. The information exists to conduct effective Stress Tests. It’s time for Institutional Investors to make greater use of Stress-Testing, not just to navigate uncertainty, but to lead from the front in a world riddled with investment uncertainty. After all, in today’s Bond Markets, the next crisis is never far away — and funds that fail to prepare should prepare to fail.
