Featured in Funds Europe:
From the start of the New Year, Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) and Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) will face a more complex methodology for disclosing implicit transaction costs. A key aspect of this change is the obligation to provide three years of historical Transaction Cost Data of implicit costs based on the arrival price methodology. For Financial Institutions already grappling with an array of stringent Reporting requirements, this new layer of disclosure brings added intricacy and cost. Furthermore, inconsistent approaches across EU member states for calculating fees compound the challenge, forcing firms to navigate divergent methodologies and Reporting standards.
The operational implications are significant. To comply, Financial Institutions will need robust systems capable of handling a wide array of jurisdictional requirements. These systems must not only support varying calculation methodologies but also adapt to different Reporting formats and seamlessly extract, integrate, and analyse Data often scattered across internal silos or even basic tools like Excel spreadsheets. For many firms, upgrading their operational architecture to meet these demands will require substantial investment in advanced technological solutions.
This rising cost of Compliance threatens to divert resources away from other critical priorities such as innovation and investment in transformative technologies. Over time, the industry may find itself squeezed between the twin pressures of Regulatory Compliance and the need to remain competitive in an increasingly globalised market.
Policymakers and market watchdogs must acknowledge these challenges and strive for greater alignment in implementing CMU regulations. While the CMU’s overarching goals are laudable, greater Regulatory cohesion across member states would significantly ease the burden on industry participants. For example, standardising methodologies for calculating fees under the PRIIPs framework would eliminate the inefficiencies and risks created by fragmented approaches.
However, firms themselves cannot afford to wait for Regulatory alignment to materialise. Proactively addressing these challenges through investments in advanced technology will be critical. By adopting sophisticated systems that can manage complex Reporting requirements, firms can enhance their operational resilience and ensure they remain compliant in a world where Regulatory complexity is the norm.
As the PRIIPs changes take effect and the CMU project gains momentum, firms and regulators alike must work toward a shared goal: fostering a financial ecosystem that is both competitive and equipped to navigate the intricate demands of modern regulation. Only by doing so can the EU achieve its vision of a unified, thriving capital market.
By Kifaya Belkaaloul, Head of Regulatory at Paris-based Data Management firm NeoXam.
